HALO AND STAR WARS PORTABLE

But personally, IвЂ™ve played all the Halo titles and this one definitely has something special that IвЂ™ve never seen before.вЂќ

WeвЂ™re optimistic that reviews and fans will respond positively, but of course, weвЂ™ll wait and see how people feel about it. So I think that whole universe and what the team has done at 343 with this game and I would stay staying true to what is Halo as a Halo fan, but also modernizing it and innovating it in some ways that I think makes the game a lot of fun to play and really engaging. Evil cortanna, warden eternal, only 2 more chef lvls, chef getting punshed in the head, a whole lot of fighting promethians. I've tried multiple times and always stall out after the 2nd lvl because I know what's to come. вЂњYou have that special sauceвЂ“itвЂ™s unlike anything else. Halo 5 is the only campaign I haven't play through more then once. вЂњWhatвЂ™s really so special about Halo, and people will feel it the moment they start playing the campaign, is just the richness of the universe and the story and itвЂ™s very much like what Star Wars is to movies, Halo is to games,вЂќ said MicrosoftвЂ™s Aaron Greenberg to Gamespot. It has an instantly recognizable protagonist, and a rich universe with great lore- and Microsoft thinks that this makes it the Star Wars of video games. The First Order and the Empire combined would get smoked by a handful of Federation Starships.Halo is one of the biggest franchises in gaming- highly acclaimed, massively selling, and among other things, one of the first gaming properties ever to cross over outside of video games and leverage a cross media strategy properly. Like I said- Trek tech is so far past what the first order is using the fight is completely one sided. Realistically the federation can send a photon torpedo wherever the hell it wants. The Novelization implies that with sufficient power the range of a transwarp beam is THE ENTIRE GALAXY. Again, this was a portable, HANDHELD transporter, constructed using tech that existed in the TOS era using TNG principles.

HALO AND STAR WARS PORTABLE

Khan used a PORTABLE version of a transporter to send himself 110 light years from earth to Qo'NoS in SECONDS. Speaking of which, the Abrams-Verse transporters (based on transporter tech developed by Montgomery Scott just after TNG ended- so ALL of the federation ships of that era could be assumed to have it) were similarly OP.

It could plant a bomb under Vader in the crib and spare us the pain of the prequel trilogy. The Relativity could wreck every single planet under the First Order's jurisdiction at the same time and the First Order couldn't do jack to stop it. The federation had become so advanced by the 29th century it could hit ANY point in spacetime using transporters. It could take out four trillion planets at once - every planet in the galaxy. That figure, based on how much gravitational glue a planet takes to keep together, is around 2 x 10^32 Joules.Дividing the two values, if Starkiller Base is draining all of a starвЂ™s fuel and fusing it for nefarious purposes, the new weapon could handily destroy five Alderaan-sized planets. But is that enough to destroy a planet, let alone five? The amount of energy required to destroy a planet has already been answered вЂ“ nerds wanted to know what it would take to destroy Alderaan after the first Star Warsfilm came out. вЂњIf all the hydrogen in the Sun were to be fused into helium,вЂќ Carpenter told me, вЂњThe energy equivalent of this 8.7 x 10^44 Joules.вЂќДЁ70 million trillion trillion trillion Joules is a gargantuan amount of energy, more than a few supernovasвЂ™ worth. ThatвЂ™s a small percentage, but more than enough. The rest is converted into raw energy according to EinsteinвЂ™s famous equation, E=mc2. And when that hydrogen fuses, 99.3 percent of it becomes helium. Carpenter explained to me, our sun is 73 percent hydrogen.

Halo and star wars